By Ryan Douglass
I must’ve been twelve years old when I watched Monster House for the first time—a movie that opened the door to my lifelong fascination with horror and mystery. It’s a 2006 animated film about a house that eats people, and a kid next door determined to prove the impossible thing happening across the street is real. The only obstacle is the owner of the house, Nebbercracker: a crotchety man who runs out of the front door screaming “Get off my lawn!” whenever anyone gets too close.
The movie twists a quiet suburban neighborhood into something uncanny. There’s DJ, the lonely kid who spends his days watching Nebbercracker’s house through a pair of binoculars. There’s Chowder, his overeager friend who treats too many things like a joke. There’s Jenny, the new girl who approaches the unknown with fearless confidence. And there’s the house itself: a weathered, breathing structure with creaking floorboards, snapping teeth, a snakelike tongue, and a grotesque uvula hanging in its entryway.
Nebbercracker is the secondary villain, a man whose tragic backstory isn’t revealed until act three, after we’ve followed DJ and his friends into solving the absurd question—is the house alive? As the mystery unfolds, you discover you’ve misunderstood the monstrous thing all along—both the house itself and the man inside it.
This movie finds its stride at the confluence of mystery and horror, and is successful in both: it makes the audience afraid of the monster, and then uncovers why the monster exists. Its protagonists are able to uncover the tragedy behind the violence in addition to proving the existence of it. The answer is more complex than whether the house is alive or not, because it concerns what the house represents about the person inside it.
Like all great mysteries, it asks us to sit with our worst assumptions about the villains until the story is ready to prove us wrong. We learn that someone we’d flattened into a type was something more complex all along. We see how wrong we can be with our initial guesses, and that complicates the speed at which we jump to conclusions the next go around.
The mysteries that stay with me are the ones that force me to interrogate my own certainty and challenge a narrative I’ve built in my head, that remind me that people are more complicated than the roles they’ve been assigned.
Years after watching Monster House, as I wrote my own stories, I found myself fascinated with the dissonance between perception and truth. It’s what forms the bones of my novel, Night of Madness, which follows teenagers competing in a game show inside an abandoned asylum; a show run by a man named Jack with a proclivity for Hollywood magic—stunts, set pieces, and special effects—who treats his contestants as characters in a horror movie. At the heart of it all is a main character trying to decode what around her is real and what’s just movie magic.
The asylum functions much like Nebbercracker’s house—a haunted structure that seems to have a life and intention of its own, even as the real mystery lies in the person behind it. Each room has some fog around the edges of logic, and sense, encouraging the contestants, and the reader, to make conclusions before they have enough information.
Monster House left me wondering what exists beneath the surface of what is scary on the face. It understood something about storytelling that I was still learning as a kid: that fear and reputation are built out of gaps we fill in ourselves. As I grew into a writer who would tell my own tales, I came to learn the trick of the mystery genre not just here but everywhere it works: rather than lying to the reader, or intentionally misleading them, it hands you fragments and trusts you to build a whole picture yourself.
Learning Nebbercracker’s story complicated the judgments of both the kids and the viewer, leading them to understand the man differently in hindsight. But understanding someone is not the same as excusing them, and a mystery doesn’t have to erase the harm a villain has caused to be transformative or emotionally rigorous. The best ones reveal the path that led someone there, asking not only whodunnit, but why. They remind us that every action has a story behind it, every monster has history, and every narrator can misunderstand the first thing they see.
If you enjoyed this article, consider subscribing to The Strand Magazine.
We publish newly discovered stories, original fiction, and interviews with major writers.
Be the first to comment